<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Handling Concurrency with the Entity Framework in an ASP.NET Web Application</title><link>http://asp.net</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:54:22 GMT</pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>Comments for Handling Concurrency with the Entity Framework in an ASP.NET Web Application</description><language>en</language><atom:link href="http://asp.net/rss/comments/33227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment Posted by dhassen</title><link>http://asp.net/web-forms/tutorials/continuing-with-ef/handling-concurrency-with-the-entity-framework-in-an-asp-net-web-application</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 05:02:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000013976</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>It would&#39;ve been nice to show an example using the timestamp without using stored procedures. You mention that they don&#39;t have to go hand in hand, but unfortunatley don&#39;t offer an alternative example. Good stuff except for that though!</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i1.asp.net/avatar/dhassen.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635047468800000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item><item><title>Comment Posted by tdykstra</title><link>http://asp.net/web-forms/tutorials/continuing-with-ef/handling-concurrency-with-the-entity-framework-in-an-asp-net-web-application</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:43:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000014020</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>@dhassen - Everything should be the same except for the SP mapping -- did you try it without an SP and run into a problem, and if so can you describe what issues you ran into?</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i3.asp.net/avatar/tdykstra.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635047468800000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item><item><title>Comment Posted by stefansorinc</title><link>http://asp.net/web-forms/tutorials/continuing-with-ef/handling-concurrency-with-the-entity-framework-in-an-asp-net-web-application</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 10:39:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000015268</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>  ok</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i2.asp.net/avatar/stefansorinc.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635047468800000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item><item><title>Comment Posted by jrtibayan</title><link>http://asp.net/web-forms/tutorials/continuing-with-ef/handling-concurrency-with-the-entity-framework-in-an-asp-net-web-application</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 21:54:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000015632</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>great tutorial</p><p></p><p>there&#39;s just one thing id like to ask</p><p></p><p>on the OfficeAssignment page why. im my understanding is correct, it doesnt detect concurrency conflicts during deletion.. am i right?</p><p></p><p>should you or should you not detect concurrency conflict during deletion?</p><p></p><p>cause for me theres no problem if the records content was edited, cause if im the user i want to delete it whatever content it may have.</p><p></p><p>or should you detect concurrency conflict on deletion just to check if the record is still there</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i3.asp.net/avatar/jrtibayan.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635047468800000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item></channel></rss>