<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Passing Data to View Master Pages</title><link>http://asp.net</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:54:21 GMT</pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>Comments for Passing Data to View Master Pages</description><language>en</language><atom:link href="http://asp.net/rss/comments/27591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment Posted by neutrino</title><link>http://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/views/passing-data-to-view-master-pages-vb</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 08:54:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000010988</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>In reference to the &quot;good solution&quot; explained above, I have seen that suggestion in a few books and other articles. However, what if some of my actions in the controller do not return a page but just a partial view, or json for example. The code to create the master page model would still be run wasting resources?</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i3.asp.net/avatar/neutrino.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635048205600000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item></channel></rss>