<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Validation with the Data Annotation Validators</title><link>http://asp.net</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:45:55 GMT</pubDate><generator>umbraco</generator><description>Comments for Validation with the Data Annotation Validators</description><language>en</language><atom:link href="http://asp.net/rss/comments/27587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><item><title>Comment Posted by Pure Sine Wave</title><link>http://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/models-(data)/validation-with-the-data-annotation-validators-vb</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:20:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000010217</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>How about proofing the VB.NET code in your &quot;tutorials&quot; instead of relying on the output of a C# to VB.NET converter?   </p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i3.asp.net/avatar/Pure%20Sine%20Wave.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635049385200000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item><item><title>Comment Posted by wizzarding</title><link>http://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/models-(data)/validation-with-the-data-annotation-validators-vb</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:45:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">00000000-0000-0000-0000000014053</guid><description><![CDATA[ <p>The VB code is still being generated incorrectly! I know MS is giving up on VB, but there are still a lot of us out there. Please try and fix this one.</p>]]></description><enclosure length="0" type="image/png" url="http://i1.asp.net/avatar/wizzarding.jpg?forceidenticon=false&amp;dt=635049385200000000&amp;enableAvatar=False&amp;cdn_id=2013-05-10-001" /></item></channel></rss>