Creating a Controllerhttp://asp.netSat, 04 Sep 2010 08:51:12 GMTumbracoComments for Creating a ControllerenComment Posted by MDKimzeyhttp://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/controllers-and-routing/creating-a-controller-csThu, 05 Aug 2010 12:55:25 GMT00000000-0000-0000-000000009764The "magic suffix" stuff in MVC really is bit obnoxious. This level of abstraction means that developers only have control over the tip of the iceberg.

I think this leads to a great deal of head scratching. It's good in one way - but it makes me extremely uncomfortable.

]]>Comment Posted by MDKimzeyhttp://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/controllers-and-routing/creating-a-controller-csThu, 05 Aug 2010 13:20:38 GMT00000000-0000-0000-000000009765For example:

<li><%: Html.ActionLink("Do Something", "SomeFunction", "Some")%></li>

Would be far more understandable as:

<li><%: Html.ActionLink("Do Something", "SomeFunction", "SomeController")%></li>

]]>Comment Posted by mxmissilehttp://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/controllers-and-routing/creating-a-controller-csFri, 06 Aug 2010 12:50:28 GMT00000000-0000-0000-000000009776@MDKimzey That's why we have typed ActionLinks:

<%: Html.ActionLink<SomeController>(x => x.SomeFuciont(),"Do something")%>

Magic strings must die.

]]>Comment Posted by talktoanilhttp://asp.net/mvc/tutorials/older-versions/controllers-and-routing/creating-a-controller-csSat, 04 Sep 2010 08:51:12 GMT00000000-0000-0000-0000000010118lol...good one MDK and MXM

]]>